2012 Mazda MAZDA3

Problems, recalls and owner-reported issues

Power train is the leading concern among 226 owner complaints filed for this model year. This is the 3rd highest complaint count among 22 MAZDA3 model years with reports.

Complaints by model year
  1. 226

Of the 2012 reports, 9 involved a crash and 1 involved a fire. 5 people were injured.

Primary concernPower train40 reports · 18% of complaints
Owner complaints226Filed with NHTSA
Recall relationship1 safety recallNHTSA campaign records

What owners report most often

  1. Power train40
  2. Engine32
  3. Exterior lighting31
  4. Electrical system25
  5. Vehicle speed control20
  6. Fuel/propulsion system18
  7. Other or unspecified18
  8. Air bags17

Recalls and investigations

  1. Structure, body, hatchback/liftgateSep 6, 2016

    Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain model year 2010-2013 Mazda3 and Mazdaspeed3 vehicles manufactured November 18, 2008, to June 8, 2013, 2012-2015 Mazda5 vehicles manufactured October 26, 2010, to June 22, 2015, 2016 CX-3 vehicles manufactured June 1, 2015, to December 26, 2015, and 2013-2016 CX-5 vehicles manufactured December 15, 2011, to December 26, 2015. On the affected vehicles, the lift gate support struts may corrode, possibly causing the struts to break and/or the lift gate to drop unexpectedly.

    If the lift gate falls unexpectedly, it may hit the user, increasing their risk of injury.

    Mazda dealers will replace the both lift gate supports, free of charge, however parts are not currently available. The recall began April 2017. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500. Mazda's number for this recall is 9916H.

    Campaign 16V644000 on NHTSA.gov

Representative owner complaints

226 reports, newest first.

  1. Air bags, Aug 23, 2011

    TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 MAZDA MAZDA3. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED THE AIR BAG LIGHT ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE TECHNICIANS RECALIBRATED THE SEAT AND STATED THE SENSOR FUNCTIONED CORRECTLY. THE TECHNICIANS ALSO STATED THE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE SEAT MADE IT DIFFICULT FOR THE SEAT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE DRIVER WAS IN THE SEAT. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 10.