2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Problems, recalls and owner-reported issues

Fuel/propulsion system is the leading concern among 280 owner complaints filed for this model year. This is the 10th highest complaint count among 23 C-Class model years with reports.

Complaints by model year
  1. 280

Of the 2007 reports, 11 involved a crash and 5 involved a fire. 13 people were injured.

Primary concernFuel/propulsion system76 reports · 27% of complaints
Owner complaints280Filed with NHTSA
Recall relationshipNo recalls on fileNHTSA campaign records

What owners report most often

  1. Fuel/propulsion system76
  2. Power train56
  3. Air bags55
  4. Engine42
  5. Fuel system18
  6. Electrical system17
  7. Gasoline17
  8. Vehicle speed control17

Recalls and investigations

No safety recalls on file.

Representative owner complaints: engine

54 reports, newest first. Show all

  1. Engine and engine cooling, Aug 30, 2011

    FC 1208 COMPLAINT FOR ENGINE/ENGINE COOLING; A BALANCE SHAFT ISSUE. *TR

  2. Engine and engine cooling, May 28, 2011

    MY MERCEDES C280 4MATIC, ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AT 62,000 MILES, DIAGNOSED WITH A FAULTY "ENGINE BALANCE SHAFT" WAS TOLD IT WOULD COST AROUND $6,000 TO FIX AND IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS. PART SHOULD BE RECALLED ! VERY DANGEROUS, AND WAY TOO COMMON TO NOT BE FAULT OF MERCEDES. *TR

  3. Engine and engine cooling, Aug 1, 2007

    2007 C280 MERCEDES-BENZ LEASE WITH STALLING PROBLEMS**CC THE CONSUMER STATED 31 DAYS AFTER PURCHASING THE VEHICLE WHILE DRIVING IN THE CAR WITH HER DAUGHTER THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE VIOLENTLY, THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AND THE TEMPERATURE GAUGE STARTED TO INCREASE RAPIDLY. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED THE DEALER WHO INFORMED HER OF THE PROBLEM AND WAS TOLD IT WAS BAD GAS. THE CONSUMER STATED ONCE THE VEHICLE WAS ASSESSED THEY INFORMED HER THAT COIL #4 WAS THE PROBLEM. *TR

  4. Engine and engine cooling, Jul 14, 2007

    I TOOK DELIVERY OF A NEW 2007 MERCEDES BENZ C280 4MATIC VEHICLE THE 1ST WEEK OF JANUARY,2007 & ON JANUARY 14, 2007 I WAS RETURNING HOME ON A US HIGHWAY IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA WHEN I APPROACHED A SMALL (8 INCHES TALL) HOUSE CAT OR POSSUM & WAS UNABLE TO AVOID RUNNING OVER THE ANIMAL. RATHER THAN THE ANIMAL MAKING CONTACT WITH THE "SKID (PROTECTIVE) PLATE" & FALLING TO THE PAVEMENT, THE ANIMAL BUSTED THROUGH THE PLATE & ENTERED INTO THE RADIATOR FAN UNIT DOING EXTENSIVE DAMAGE (APPROXIMATELY $3000). UPON INSPECTION, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE "SKID PLATE" WAS A THIN PLASTIC COVERING NOT CAPABLE OF DEFLECTING THE IMPACT OF AN OBJECT, BUT RATHER ALLOWING THE OBJECT TO ENTER THE ENGINE CAVITY. I WOULD REQUEST THAT A STUDY BE DONE TO DETERMINE IF THIS PLATE MEETS THE INDUSTRY STANDARDS. *TR